·
LIFEGUARDS in
Australia wear them. A mainstream British retailer sells a fashion version of
them on the high street. But the “burkini”, a body-covering swimsuit (named
with the portmanteau of “burqa” and “bikini”), has been banned this summer by
the mayor of Cannes from his stretch of Mediterranean beach, as well as by a
dozen other mayors of French seaside towns. In countries with a tradition of liberal
multiculturalism, such a ban is greeted by incomprehension, if not ridicule.
The
other principle is women’s equality. It may appear bizarre, or frivolous, to
argue that women should bare more flesh. But many on the French left are
willing to put it even before liberty, another founding value of republican
France. The logic of the burkini, says Laurence Rossignol, the Socialist
women’s minister, is to “hide women’s bodies in order better to control them”.
What outsiders fail to
understand, the French argue, is that such body wear is not just a casual
choice but part of an attempt by political Islamism to win recruits and test
the resilience of the French republic. Prime Minister Manuel Valls dismisses as
naive those who see it as being no different than a wetsuit. The burkini, he
says, is part of a “political project”.
The difficulty is
that, after a series of deadly terrorist attacks over the past 18 months,
France is in a state of heightened tension. Perceived provocations on both
sides are amplified.
It is not just civil-liberty activists who
consider the mayors’ ban excessive, or stigmatising. Some French scholars of
Islam, such as Olivier Roy, consider it “absurd” to conflate the burkini with
hard-line Islamism, not least because the latter does not permit women to bathe
publicly in the first place.
Politicians, though,
are unlikely to cede ground. France looks set to defend, if not tighten, its
strict approach to head-covering.
Yet on Friday France's
highest administrative court struck a blow against controversial 'burkini
bans'. The Council of State suspended the prohibition in Villeneuve-Loubet,
just west of Nice, saying it "seriously, and clearly illegally, breached
the fundamental freedoms to come and go, the freedom of beliefs and individual
freedom."