9/18/2021

Will Neobanks outlast the pandemic?






















"What do you think we are - a bank?” asks an advertisement for Current, a neobank, on New York’s subway. It goes on to describe bank branches, poor customer service and overdraft fees as relics. 

The company is one of a hundred-odd “neobanks”  competing to shake up retail banking in America, and which have exploded in size and number in the past year. On August 13th Chime, the country’s biggest neobank, raised $25bn—about the same as America’s 13th largest listed bank.

As the ad suggests, most neobanks are not technically banks. They offer debit cards and online banking services through fanzy apps. The startups are proud of their speed: they typically deposit paycheques a few days faster than large banks and, thanks to simpler identity checks, open accounts in minutes, even for customers with poor credit histories.

Unlike conventional banks, which also earn money on overdraft and other fees, neobanks make most if of their money from interchange fees on debit-card transactions. Regulators allow small banks to charge at least double the interchange fees that large ones do; the benefit is passed on to the fintechs that latch on to them.

The pandemic partly explains neobanks’ success. According to Apptopia, a data provider, the number of monthly active users of neobank apps doubled between July 2019 and June 2021, while those of traditional banking apps shrank a little. Top neobanks boasted nearly 20m downloads in the first half of this year alone.

The underlying drivers of the boom, though, are long-standing. Many customers have been poorly served by the financial system, if not shut out altogether.  The larger neobanks aspire to help those living paycheque to paycheque; others cater to specific underserved groups such as migrants. Social purpose aside, this makes business sense: such customers tend to save little and spend often, which suits the interchange-fee business, explains Max Flötotto of McKinsey, a consultancy. Jarad Fisher of Dave, another neobank, hopes that, once in the system, customers “graduate” to using more profitable services. To that end, his firm helps consumers find gig work.

Optimists say traditional banks will struggle to compete with neobanks, given the difficulty of modernising technology and customer service, and the risk of cannibalising their fee-based business. Banks’ shareholders may also be less keen on innovation than venture capitalists, says Scott Galloway of New York University.

Many neobanks have realized that to achieve sustained profitability, they have to get into lending, says Jeff Tijssen of Bain, another consultancy. A few firms are launching credit cards and other lending products, venturing further into the terrain of conventional banks.

However, the challengers face hurdles, too. A business based on interchange fees is only viable if costs are contained and volumes are high. Surveys suggest that a small fraction of bank customers regard the fintechs as their primary bank.

Meanwhile, giants such as Google and Walmart are starting to dabble in digital finance.



From The Economist (edited)